Turn decarbonisation costs into cheaper capital — and fund SAF, CORSIA compliance, and fleet renewal with a finance-led plan.
VURDHAAN helps transport operators translate operational decarbonisation KPIs into bankable financing structures (green/transition instruments and sustainability-linked loans), so interest savings and improved terms can be redirected into biofuels, credits, and efficiency upgrades.
- Aligned with recognized market frameworks (ICMA Green Bond Principles, Sustainability-Linked Loan Principles, Poseidon Principles)
- Built for auditability: baselines, KPI definitions, verification pathways, and reporting packs
- Designed to answer the lender question: “Are these KPIs material, measurable, and decision-useful?”
Prefer a structured start? Ask for a feasibility study to map KPIs, data readiness, and financing options.
Aviation
CORSIA offsetting requirements begin from 2024
Implication: carbon unit strategy and governance becomes financially material.
Fuel costs
SAF often carries a multi-x premium vs fossil jet fuel
Implication: operators need capital structures that can absorb the premium.
Maritime (EU)
EU ETS phases in (40% → 70% → 100%)
Implication: escalating carbon cost exposure needs a financing plan.
The commercial reality
Decarbonisation in aviation and maritime is no longer “just ESG.” It is a compounding cost stack: fuel premiums (SAF/biofuels), compliance (carbon markets), and capital renewal (fleet/vessel upgrades).
The VURDHAAN pitch
If your decarbonisation actions can be expressed as robust KPIs (e.g., SAF uptake, emissions intensity, fleet renewal), they can be used to structure sustainability-linked financing — with margin incentives that free up budget for SAF and eligible credits.
No forms on this page — click Contact Us and we’ll reply with a short scoping note and proposed next steps.
Public reference points (selected)
The problem is not ambition — it’s funding under pressure.
Operators are being asked to decarbonise while managing thin margins, volatile fuel, and rising compliance exposure. The result: sustainability work gets deprioritised exactly when it becomes most expensive.
Problem
- SAF/biofuel premiums are real and hard to budget.
- Offsetting is entering operational reality (CORSIA context from 2024).
- Capital renewal decisions (fleet/vessels) are now climate-weighted by stakeholders.
Impact
- Unplanned carbon costs → higher OPEX volatility.
- Fragmented reporting → weak lender confidence.
- Missed opportunities for margin incentives and better terms.
Solution
Build a financeable KPI architecture (SAF, fleet renewal, emissions intensity), then use it to structure sustainability-linked financing — so savings and incentives can fund decarbonisation actions.
Why now
Regulatory and market signals are converging. In the EU, SAF mandates start at 2% from 2025 (ReFuelEU Aviation), FuelEU Maritime begins GHG-intensity reductions from 2025, and EU ETS maritime compliance ramps up over time. Even outside Europe, airline offsetting governance is becoming a board-level issue.
Contact UsOur approach: finance-grade sustainability, built step by step.
We work like a lender would: define material KPIs, lock baselines, prove data integrity, then structure and document the instrument.
Discovery & decision map
What costs are rising (SAF, offsets, capex), which contracts matter (leases, loans, bonds), and who signs off.
KPI + baseline architecture
Select KPIs that are material, measurable, and verifiable (e.g., SAF uptake, emissions intensity, fleet renewal).
Finance structuring options
Evaluate green/transition financing vs sustainability-linked terms; design margin mechanics and documentation needs.
Assurance-ready package
Define verification pathways (internal controls + external review), and produce investor/lender-ready packs.
Execution support & reporting
Support negotiations, reporting cadence, and KPI performance governance — so incentives are actually earned.
Services built for this topic
Each service is designed to move you closer to cheaper capital — and a funded decarbonisation roadmap.
Sustainability-Linked Loan feasibility study
Assess whether your existing/new financings can credibly link to KPIs — and what margin incentives could be achievable.
- Clear “go / no-go” view
- KPI shortlist + data readiness
- Structuring pathways & risks
KPI & target design
Define KPIs lenders can underwrite, with baselines, boundaries, and verification plans.
- Materiality narrative
- Ambitious-yet-deliverable targets
- Verification roadmap
CORSIA governance & strategy
Operationalize offsetting obligations: procurement strategy, internal controls, and reporting readiness.
- Compliance-aligned workflows
- Risk management lens
- Decision-ready reporting
Green / transition frameworks
Build a use-of-proceeds and impact reporting structure aligned to market expectations.
- Framework drafting support
- Project eligibility mapping
- Impact & allocation reporting
Grant & climate fund mapping
Identify relevant public funding streams and shape proposals that score well on impact and deliverability.
- Shortlist of fit-for-purpose calls
- Application strategy
- Consortium support
Maritime: Poseidon alignment
For shipping finance contexts, translate operational plans into portfolio-alignment language financiers already use.
- Metrics and evidence pack
- Decarb trajectory narrative
- Reporting cadence design
Interactive: see how KPI-backed financing works
Explore how KPI-backed financing can create headroom for SAF and carbon costs — without relying on vague promises.
1) KPI-backed finance flow (click a step)
Click to reveal what “good” looks like in each stage.
Cost drivers
Identify the cost stack (SAF/biofuel premium, carbon exposure, capex cycle) and map it to your financing reality (leases, term loans, revolvers, bonds).
- Define decisions and owners: procurement, fleet, compliance, treasury.
- Model cost exposure ranges and sensitivities.
- Select candidate levers that can be KPI-linked.
2) Margin-savings estimator (illustrative)
If a sustainability-linked structure achieves a margin step-down, the savings can be ring-fenced into a budget line for SAF or eligible credits.
Estimated annual interest savings
$0
Estimated total savings over term
$0
Where VURDHAAN helps most: The challenge is rarely the math — it’s making KPIs credible enough to be priced. We help build the KPI definitions, baselines, governance, and verification pathway that financiers trust.
Key deadlines / requirements (selected)
Requirements vary by geography and route. Below are selected, high-signal milestones commonly driving cost and reporting pressure.
CORSIA First Phase begins (2024–2026)
Operational focus shifts from preparation to compliance governance and procurement strategy.
EU: SAF minimum share starts; FuelEU Maritime begins
For operators exposed to EU rules, compliance costs and reporting become more immediate.
EU aviation: free allocation phase-out completes
Carbon cost exposure becomes more direct; internal carbon budgeting maturity matters.
CORSIA Second Phase & EU ETS maritime full coverage
Higher certainty that carbon cost and compliance systems must scale, not remain ad-hoc.
Make your decarbonisation plan financeable — and protect your margin.
If you’re facing rising costs for SAF, offsets, or fleet renewal, we’ll help you design a lender-ready KPI structure and identify the financing routes most likely to create real savings — with governance strong enough to earn incentives.
What happens after you contact us
- We respond with 3–5 clarifying questions tailored to your fleet/route/finance reality.
- We propose a short scoping note with the feasibility workstream options.
- If useful, we share a draft KPI shortlist and the evidence lenders typically request.
We won’t oversell timelines. We focus on building the evidence and structure needed to unlock real financing outcomes.