A Closer Look at the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and Why It Matters

A Decade of Climate Action with Tangible Results

The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) has been active since 2005 and continues to stand as a foundational climate policy tool. Despite ongoing debates about market-based mechanisms, the latest data tells a compelling story. Emissions in sectors covered under the EU ETS have dropped by 50 percent since its inception—a benchmark that signals more than just procedural success; it illustrates that regulated carbon pricing can deliver measurable climate results.

Beyond Numbers: Strategic Evolution

The fourth phase of the EU ETS, spanning 2021 to 2030, targets a 62 percent reduction in emissions from 2005 levels. This goal, though ambitious, is being met with consistent progress. The scheme’s evolving design reflects a calculated effort to stay ahead of global climate targets while remaining sensitive to industrial competitiveness.

Allowances and Adjustments

Operators under the EU ETS must match their greenhouse gas emissions annually with allowances—each representing one tonne of CO₂ or its equivalent. These allowances are not static. In fact, they are being reduced over time to tighten emissions ceilings. The annual reduction rate, previously at 2.2 percent, is now increasing to 4.3 percent between 2024 and 2027, with a further rise to 4.4 percent thereafter.

The Role of Free Allowances and Carbon Leakage

While allowances must often be purchased, some sectors—particularly those at risk of relocation outside the EU due to high carbon costs—have received free allocations. However, the structure of this system is changing. The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is being introduced to level the playing field by pricing carbon on select imports. This shift supports the gradual phase-out of free allowances by 2034, fostering fairer international competition while preserving climate integrity.

What the Latest Data Reveals

As of the most recent reporting deadline (March 31, 2025), emissions from stationary installations and aircraft operators declined by 5 percent in 2024 compared to 2023. With overall emissions now 50 percent below 2005 levels, the data reinforces that the EU ETS is not just policy—it’s progress.

Power Sector Leads the Transition

The power sector deserves special mention. Emissions from electricity generation dropped by 12 percent compared to 2023. This was driven by:

  • 8 percent increase in renewable electricity
  • 15 percent reduction in coal usage
  • 8 percent decrease in gas consumption
  • 5 percent decline in nuclear power generation

Hydropower and solar energy emerged as critical contributors, proving that green electricity is both scalable and reliable—even as wind energy remained steady despite less favorable conditions.

Stability and Variation in Industry

While emissions across energy-intensive industries remained relatively flat, sectoral nuances are significant. Fertilizer production saw a 7 percent increase, while emissions from cement production declined by 5 percent. These contrasts highlight the importance of targeted strategies within the broader regulatory framework.

Aviation and Maritime: Onboarding New Frontiers

Aviation’s Expanding Footprint

Aviation emissions increased by 15 percent year-on-year, driven in part by the reinstatement of geographic coverage to include flights to and from the EU’s outermost regions. This development may appear counterproductive, but it is more accurately a recalibration of the data scope, offering a fuller picture of aviation’s environmental impact.

Maritime Sector Comes Aboard

From January 1, 2024, maritime transport officially entered the EU ETS fold. For the first time, shipowners are required to monitor emissions and begin purchasing allowances, initiating a transformative shift in an often-overlooked sector.

While full compliance begins in 2026, the transition is underway:

  • 2024: 40 percent of emissions must be covered by allowances
  • 2025: 70 percent requirement
  • 2026 onward: 100 percent obligation

In parallel, reporting systems will expand to cover methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O), adding layers of climate accountability.

Quiet Confidence in a Carbon Market

Criticism of carbon trading schemes often centers on complexity or the potential for market manipulation. Yet the EU ETS is increasingly characterized by precision, transparency, and maturity. The recent expansion into maritime transport, alignment with CBAM, and the declining allowance cap underscore a coordinated, systemic approach to climate policy.

The consistent reduction of emissions—particularly in the power sector—and the ability to integrate new industries show that carbon markets can evolve to meet rising climate ambitions without stalling economic resilience.

Looking Forward: Lessons for the Global Community

The EU ETS is not a silver bullet. But its evolution shows that when designed thoughtfully and adjusted strategically, carbon pricing systems can drive real decarbonization. The scheme’s ability to maintain emissions reduction trajectories while bringing new sectors onboard is noteworthy.

What makes the EU ETS particularly effective is not just its rules—but its responsiveness. Adjusting free allowances, expanding coverage, tightening caps—these measures reflect an adaptive policy mechanism rather than a rigid system.

Conclusion: Policy in Motion, Progress in Practice

The EU ETS has quietly become one of the most effective policy instruments in Europe’s climate toolkit. Its success lies not in a one-time achievement, but in its ability to adapt, regulate, and scale across diverse industries.

With emissions 50 percent lower than 2005 levels, and momentum continuing through new regulations and expanded sectors, the EU ETS provides a compelling example of how policy can not only envision but also realize a low-carbon economy.

As other regions explore carbon markets, the EU’s experience offers valuable insights—not just into emissions accounting, but into the art of designing systems that grow stronger with time.

Source