EU Space Act

Skip to content
EU Space Act readiness Contact Us

EU Space Act (Proposal) Sustainable Space Operations

Be ready for the EU Space Act—make sustainability a mission assurance advantage.

VURDHAAN helps satellite operators, launch providers, and space service companies translate evolving EU requirements into practical controls, credible evidence, and a defensible sustainability narrative—without slowing engineering.

  • Grounded in the EU Space Act pillars: safety, resilience (cyber), sustainability
  • Built for time-to-license, auditability, and procurement-grade evidence
  • Standards-aware: ISO 24113, IADC guidelines, UNOOSA LTS, ESA Zero Debris

Transport sustainability rigor, applied to space: regulatory mapping, quantified impacts, risk governance, and credible reporting—adapted to orbital realities.

Tracked objects (approx.)
~40,000
Space surveillance networks track tens of thousands of objects.
Debris > 1 cm (estimate)
>1.2M
Large enough to cause catastrophic damage.
Zero Debris trajectory
2030
ESA’s “Zero Debris” ambition targets 2030 for future missions.
What we bring
Evidence
From “policy intent” to an audit-ready, engineering-aligned evidence pack.
Start ahead: we’ve already built a detailed EU Space Act dossier to accelerate your internal alignment. Explore the dossier.

The challenge: regulation is catching up to orbital reality.

Orbits are more congested, infrastructure is more critical, and sustainability expectations are sharpening. The EU Space Act is designed to harmonize how space services are regulated across the Union.

Problem

Fragmented requirements and rising debris/cyber risks make “minimum compliance” brittle—especially for services with an EU market nexus.

  • Multiple jurisdictions, inconsistent evidence
  • Debris mitigation expectations tightening
  • Cyber resilience now part of the licensing conversation

Impact

Delays, rework, and avoidable risk become commercial problems: licensing friction, harder procurement, higher insurance scrutiny, and mission risk exposure.

Benchmark: the Commission’s impact assessment indicates binding measures could increase manufacturing costs by ~3–10% vs baseline (context-dependent).

Solution

Build a single, defensible readiness baseline across the three pillars—then prove it with an evidence pack that engineering can sustain.

  • Applicability & obligations mapped to your services
  • Debris / EOL plans and operational controls
  • Environmental impact method + credible reporting
  • Cyber risk & continuity controls, tailored to mission criticality

Our approach: clarity → controls → evidence.

We work like an internal senior team: structured, commercially aware, and designed for real-world programs and timelines.

  1. Scope & applicability

    Identify EU nexus, services covered, and what “proportional” looks like for your risk profile.

  2. Baseline & gap analysis

    Map current practices to the three pillars (safety, resilience, sustainability) and surface the minimum viable control set.

  3. Quantify impacts & risks

    Debris/EOL, environmental impacts (Earth + orbital), and cyber/continuity risks—measured, not hand-waved.

  4. Implement controls

    Engineering-aligned procedures, design requirements, supplier asks, and operational playbooks.

  5. Evidence pack & governance

    A single “show-me” package: policies, calculations, logs, and decision records—ready for regulators, customers, and insurers.

If you operate in Europe (or sell into it), readiness is now a commercial differentiator.

Let’s scope what the EU Space Act could mean for your services, and where the fastest risk reduction sits.

Contact Us

Services for EU Space Act readiness & sustainable space operations

Outcome-driven support—so you can move from intent to implementable requirements and credible proof.

EU Space Act readiness mapping

Know what applies to you, where you’re exposed, and what evidence regulators and customers will expect.

Benefit: reduces rework and “surprise” obligations late in licensing/procurement.

Debris mitigation & end-of-life (EOL)

Design and operational controls for disposal, passivation, conjunction response, and documentation.

Benefit: improves insurability and lowers operational risk posture.

Environmental impact method (space + Earth)

Build a defensible approach to assess and measure environmental impacts—aligned to emerging EU expectations.

Benefit: strengthens bids, funding narratives, and stakeholder credibility.

Cyber resilience & continuity for space services

Mission-critical risk assessment, control baseline, incident readiness, and supplier risk asks.

Benefit: reduces downtime and customer/regulator confidence gaps.

Sustainable space operations strategy

Roadmap that integrates debris, resilience, and environmental performance into mission planning and product strategy.

Benefit: turns compliance into a durable competitive edge.

Supplier & component sustainability requirements

Contract-ready sustainability clauses, evidence asks, and a supply-chain readiness playbook.

Benefit: lowers lifecycle risk and accelerates audit response.

Funding & R&D support (EU programs)

Position sustainable tech work (e.g., mitigation, servicing) with a stronger “why now” and measurable outcomes.

Benefit: increases funding coherence and evaluation strength.

Sustainability reporting for space stakeholders

Translate technical controls into credible disclosures for customers, insurers, investors, and the public.

Benefit: builds trust without oversharing sensitive mission details.

Proof of expertise: standards, frameworks, deliverables

We align your readiness program to the “reference points” that regulators, agencies, and serious counterparties recognize.

Standards & guidance we align to

  • ISO 24113 — space debris mitigation requirements (unmanned systems)
  • IADC — consensus debris mitigation guidelines
  • UNOOSA — guidelines for long-term sustainability of outer space activities
  • ESA Zero Debris — modern expectations (e.g., 5-year post-mission deorbit for ESA missions)

We treat these as practical design/ops inputs, not a compliance checkbox exercise.

Typical deliverables (what you can show)

  • EU Space Act applicability memo + obligation map
  • Debris & EOL policy + mission-specific compliance checklist
  • Environmental impact method + calculation workbook outline
  • Cyber resilience risk assessment + control baseline
  • Evidence pack index (logs, models, decisions, procedures)
  • Stakeholder-ready sustainability narrative (procurement-grade)

The VURDHAAN effect

What changes when sustainability is engineered into operations—not bolted on.

Clear obligations Teams stop debating “what applies” and start implementing.
Lower mission risk Debris/EOL and conjunction readiness are operationalized.
Faster due diligence Procurement, insurers, and partners get coherent evidence.
Credible sustainability story Quantified impact + controls (not marketing language).
Contact Us

We’ll respond with next steps and a practical scoping path—no generic pitch deck.

Interactive figures: from regulation to implementation

Use these to align leadership and engineering quickly.

Figure 1: EU Space Act readiness flow (click each step)

Scope & EU market nexus

Identify which services and entities are in scope, how proportionality applies, and what “good evidence” looks like for your risk profile.

  • Service mapping & EU nexus assessment
  • Licensing pathway & stakeholder map
  • Priority control set (what to do first)
Figure 2: The VURDHAAN effect ladder (move the slider)

Current state

Level 2 — Compliant by policy
Tip: align Level 3+ before enforcement dates are known
Higher levels mean controls are measurable, repeatable, and evidenced—ready for regulators and procurement.

Compliant by policy

Policies exist, but implementation evidence is inconsistent. Risk: surprises during licensing, audits, or customer due diligence.

  • Draft debris/EOL principles
  • Basic risk register
  • Ad-hoc stakeholder responses

Key milestones (known) + what to do now

The EU Space Act is in the ordinary legislative procedure. Requirements and dates can evolve—so focus on no-regret controls first.

Proposal published (25 June 2025)

The Commission published the proposal structured around safety, resilience, and sustainability—intended to harmonize space activities across the EU.

  • Start your applicability & obligation mapping
  • Baseline debris/EOL controls against recognized guidance
  • Define an environmental impact method you can defend

Build readiness before it becomes a scramble.

If you’re operating satellites, launching, manufacturing components, or providing downstream services with an EU nexus, the smartest move is to lock your baseline now—then iterate as the legislative text finalizes.

  • After you contact us: we’ll confirm your services, EU nexus, and priority risks.
  • We’ll propose a practical workplan focused on controls + evidence—not slideware.
  • You keep ownership; we make it implementable and defensible.
Contact Us

Prefer to self-educate first? Our EU Space Act dossier is available at vurdhaan.com/dossiers.